The International Commission on
Nobility and Royalty
(See Additional Articles below)
Orders of
Chivalry 
All the major legal principles that promote
genuine and authentic nobility, royalty and chivalry are contained in the following new two volume book. Note what
is says in the first paragraph of the Foreword:
The whole field of
nobility and royalty is in disarray and confusion. It is rife with falsehoods, misguided experts, phony princes, and
counterfeit chivalric orders. Besides the numerous scams and charlatans that exist, there is a widespread
misunderstanding of the international and natural laws that govern dynastic rights. This is a field that is truly
divided. This sad state of affairs need not continue. If international law is honored, revered and respected, then
everything can be set in its proper order. The grand key to this needed unity is the rule of the just, time-honored
laws that already exist.
The author is Dr. Stephen Baca y Kerr, JD, LLM,
MAT, former special counsel to the Imperial and Royal House of Habsburg, Professor and Dean of the Law School at the
International College of Interdisciplinary Studies. His book is The Entitlement to Rule: Legal,
Non-Territorial Sovereignty in International Law and it is a masterpiece. Note excerpts of what people
have said about it:
"It is written
in a clear and compelling manner. It is hoped that more and more people will become familiar with the laws of
justice contained in this book." (Thubten Samphel, director of the Tibet Policy Institute of the Central
Tibetan Administration and author of the book Falling Through the Roof, Dharamshala, India)
"It is
magnificently done and of great worth." (Adalberto J. Urbina Briceno, Sc.D., Professor Head of the Public
International Law Chair of the Catholic University Andres Bello- Caracas)
"It is a
goldmine of references and is a valuable account of a [thought provoking] . . . and poorly understood area of law." (Rev'd
Professor Noel Cox, LLM, MA, MTheol, Ph.D., LTh, FRHists, Barrister, Aberystwyth University, New Zealand)
"Dr. Kerr has
put together a book that is a "one of a kind" providing what is needed to perpetuate the rights of deposed
sovereignty. For all those interested in the legal future of nobility and royalty, this is a very important,
scholarly and insightful book to read." (LaWanna Blount, Ph.D., F.Coll.T, vice president and professor at
the American College of Interdisciplinary Sciences, Como, Mississippi, USA)
"Dr. Kerr's
book . . . is one of those . . . path breaking works that throws new light on a field of study . . . on the complex
legal and philosophical sinews that keep alive [deposed] monarchies. . . . This type of writing fills a huge gap
within the royal studies field. . . ." (Dr. Diana Mandache, historian and author, Budapest, Romania)
"The author
obviously has a deep understanding of international law and how it relates to deposed monarchies and exiled
governments. The content is well structured and well written. I accept this book as conforming to the highest
academic standards expected of a master scholar and practitioner." (Alexander Arapov, Sc.D., Professor of
the Department of Philosophy and Sociology of the All-Russian State Distance-Learning Institute of Finance and
Economics, a branch of the Financial University of the Russian Federation)
"This has been
the most interesting and helpful book I have read in the field of nobiliary law as well as international law . . . .
It exemplifies the highest level of scholarly content, clarity and depth of inquiry yet presented on this profound
and important subject." (Prof. Dr. Mirjana Radovic-Markovic, Academician, Institute of Economic Sciences
and Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade, Serbia)
This unique book is being offered for free
because of its singular importance to the field of nobility and royalty. Go to the website: www.the-entitlement-to-rule.com.
An old English hymn expresses well the
important role that a true knight should play in our day and age:
When A Knight Won
His Spurs
When a knight won his spurs in the stories of
old
He was gentle and brave he was gallant and bold
With a shield on his arm and a lance in his hand
For God and for valour he rode through the land
No charger have I and no sword by my side
Yet still to adventure and battle I ride
Though back into storyland giants have fled
And the knights are no more and the dragons are
dead
So let faith be my shield and let hope be my
steed
Against the dragons of anger the ogres of greed
And let me set free with the sword of my youth
There is an article entitled "Chivalry
and Modern Times" elaborates on what it means to be a true knight in our day and age that
may be of real interest.
Click on any of the following sections that may
interest you:
To Help Protect and Safeguard
True Knighthood
Unfortunately, we live in a time of counterfeits.
There must be at least 100 self-styled or phony orders of knighthood on the Internet masquerading as real and
authentic, yet they have no legitimacy as genuine orders of chivalry. With so many false orders, it become
imperative that an organization be established to identify the true orders to protect the public and the honor and
good name of what is valid and true. The International Commission on Orders of Chivalry (ICOC) was officially
established for this important purpose many many years ago. We salute this organization, which plays an important
role in identifying and registering true orders.
The International Commission on Orders of
Chivalry (ICOC) has approved the following orders based upon rightful sovereignty and sound principles. We
highly recommend that you visit their website at www.icocregister.org
and become acquainted with this reputable and important organization. It is now headed by Dr. Pier Felice degli
Uberti.
A. INDEPENDENT ORDERS
1. The Sovereign
Military Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, called of Rhodes, called of Malta
B. SEMI-INDEPENDENT ORDERS
1. Alcantara
(formerly San Julian del Pereiro incorporated with Alcantara 1222)
2.
Calatrava
3.
Santiago
4. The Teutonic
Order of Saint Mary of Jerusalem
5. The Bailiwick of
Utrecht of the Teutonic Order in the Netherlands
6. Montesa (united
in 1400 with Saint George dAlfamo founded 1201)
7. Bailiwick of
Brandenburg of the Knightly Order of Saint John in Prussia
8. The Most
Venerable Order of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem
9. The Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of
Jerusalem 10. The Knightly
Order of Saint John in the Netherlands
11. The Knightly
Order of Saint John in Sweden
C. DYNASTIC ORDERS
1. ALBANIA: House of Zogu (Islamic) Two Dynastic Orders
2. AUSTRIA: House of Hapsburg-Lorraine (Lothringen) (Catholic) Two Dynastic Orders
3. BRAZIL: House of Orléans-Bragança (Catholic) Two Dynastic
Orders
4. BULGARIA: House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Orthodox) Three Dynastic
Orders
5. FRANCE:
House of Bourbon (Catholic) Three Dynastic Orders
6. GERMANY:
Anhalt
House of Ascania (Evangelical) One
Dynastic Order
Baden House of Zähringen (Evangelical) One Dynastic Order
Bavaria House of Wittelsbach (Catholic) Three Dynastic Orders
Brunswick
Brunswick-Lüneburg (House of Hanover) (Evangelical) One
Dynastic Order
Hanover House of Guelph (Evangelical) Two Dynastic Orders
Hesse House of Lorraine-Brabant (Reformed now Catholic) One Dynastic Order
Lippe House of Lippe (Reformed) One Dynastic Order
Oldenburg
House of Oldenburg (Lutheran) One Dynastic Order
Prussia House of Hohenzollern (Evangelical) Three
Dynastic Orders
Hohenzollern
House of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen (Catholic) One Dynastic
Order
Reuss House of Reuss (Lutheran) One Dynastic Orders
Saxony: Kingdom of
Saxony House of Wettin (Albertine Line) (Catholic) Three Dynastic
Orders
Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach
House of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach (Lutheran) One Dynastic
Order
Saxon Duchies House of Wettin (Ernestine Line: (1) Saxe-Meiningen, (2) Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and (3)
Saxe-Altenburg) (Lutheran) One Dynastic Order
Schaumburg-Lippe
House of Lippe (Reformed) One Dynastic Order
Waldeck House of Waldeck (Evangelical) One Dynastic Order
Württemberg
House of Württemberg (Catholic) Two Dynastic
Orders
7. GREECE: House of Oldenburg (Greek Orthodox) Four Dynastic Orders
8. ITALY:
Kingdom of Italy
House of Savoy (Catholic) Three Dynastic Orders
Parma House of Bourbon-Parma (Catholic) Two Dynastic Orders
Tuscany House of Habsburg-Lorraine (Catholic) Two Dynastic Orders
Two Sicilies
House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies (Catholic) Two Dynastic Orders
9. JUGOSLAVIA/SERBIA: House Karadjordjevic (Orthodox) Five Dynastic Orders
10. MONTENEGRO:
House of Petrovic-Njegos (Orthodox)
Three Dynastic
Orders
11.
PORTUGAL: House of Bragança (Catholic) Two Dynastic
Orders
12.
RUMANIA: House of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen (Rumanian Orthodox)
Three Dynastic Orders
13.
RUSSIA: House of Romanov-Holstein-Gottorp (Orthodox) Eight Dynastic Orders
D. OTHER INSTITUTIONS OF CHIVALRIC
CHARACTER
Ancient chivalric institutions, originally founded as
orders, subsequently revived by the dynastic successor of the founding authority.
1. PORTUGAL: House of Bragança (Catholic) One
Institution of Chivalric Character
New chivalric institutions founded by the head of a
formerly reigning dynasty.
1. GEORGIA: House
of Bragation (Orthodox) One Dynastic Order
2. ITALY: House
of Savoy (Catholic) One Dynastic Order
3. RUSSIA: House
of Romanov-Holstein-Gottorp (Orthodox) Two Dynastic Orders
Successors of chivalric institutions originally founded
under the authority of a State.
1. HUNGARY: One Institution of Chivalric
Character
There is a lot more important information on each
of these orders, on their history, principles and membership on the website of The International Commission on
Orders of Chivalry (ICOC). For information on each of these orders, please see their website at www.icocregister.org. Also,
we feel it is a great honor that on February 9,2007, His
Eminence Cardinal Pio Laghi, Patron Cardinal of Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of St John of Jerusalem of
Rhodes and of Malta, Prefect emeritus of the Congregation for Catholic Education (association of seminars and
educational institutes) has accepted to become Patron of the International Commission for Orders of Chivalry (ICOC).
(2009: http://nobilitynews.blogspot.com/2007/06/his-eminence-cardinal-pio-laghi-patron.html)
The ICOC also has a list of extinct orders, other
approved chivalric institutions, noble corporations, and nobiliary bodies that are authentic or the real thing.
Please be aware that there are a lot of counterfeits out there. (See the article called "The Self-Styled
Orders" written by Guy Stair Sainty at www.chivalricorders.org/orders/self-styled/selfstyl.htm)
Sovereignty and Orders of
Chivalry
The following is a quote from a conference of
leading international scholars on Heraldry and Chivalry. They set out principles needed, in order to distinguish the
true and genuine from the phony orders that are self-styled, dubious and lack legitimacy. They concluded:
Although, at one
time --- many centuries ago --- private people of high standing could and did create some independent Orders of
Knighthood, some among which came, in due course, to gain considerable prestige and obtained formal validity from .
. . the Crown [or sovereign authority] . . . , [however] now-a-days, Orders of Chivalry . . . must always stem from
or be . . . under the protection of Chiefs of Houses of recognised sovereign rank. (International Commission for
Orders of Chivalry, Register of Orders of Chivalry- Report of the International Commission for Orders of
Chivalry (International Commission for Orders of Chivalry/Gryfons Publishers and Distributors, USA, 1996, p.
5) (www.icocregister.org
In other words, with the rise of the
nation-states, such orders and knighthoods, along with titles of nobility (in the case of monarchies), became the
exclusive domain or right of sovereigns to reward. This is in full recognition that royal sovereignty, being the
supreme pinnacle of secular authority on earth, which is above all others, has the independent and restricted power
over the right of chivalric honors. (See: "Sovereignty
& The Future of Nobility and Royalty," "Dynastic Law" and
"Sovereignty
in the Holy Roman Empire")
Noel Cox, LLB, LLM, Ph.D. professor of
Constitutional Law, Auckland University of Technology and an expert jurist in this field, declared, Supranational
[international] organizations, unless [they] themselves [are] recognised as sovereign, cannot create Orders of
Chivalry. He also said, . . . knighthood, as traditionally understood, can only be conferred by
a Sovereign. Hence, Orders of Chivalry . . . [must be] under the protection of Chiefs or of Houses of
recognised sovereign rank. The conclusion is that, Only de jure [legal] sovereigns
. . . may create Orders of Chivalry. Descendants who do not hold de jure sovereignty, have
permanently lost the right to rule, therefore cannot create a genuine Orders of Chivalry. (See: The
sovereign authority for the creation of Orders of Chivalry www.geocities.com/noelcox/Creation.htm)
In full concurrence, retired
professor of law and international lawyer, Stephen Kerr, JD, former counsel to the Imperial and Royal House of
Hapsburg, made it clear that "the validity or legitimacy of an order of chivalry depends upon its possession
of a sovereign [not ecclesiastical, self-styled or made up] fons honorum. . . ." (See: "Dynastic
Law") A fons honorum is the perfect right to honor. A "sovereign" fons
honorum means that right to honor is from a political or secular ruler, i.e. emperor, king or sovereign prince. We
consider this to be self-evident and obvious, but it needs to be made crystal clear, as some get confused on this
point, that the great honor of knighthood is the exclusive and unique domain or property of the sovereign nobility
and royalty of the earth.
On orders founded by religions and by not
monarchs, Guy Stair Sainty, a well-known expert in orders of chivalry, explained:
The point is, they just have no rightful authority
to create or maintain orders of chivalry, because ecclesiastical authority does not have the right of sovereignty.
(Except, of course, the Catholic Pope, who is, in addition to being an religious leader, a sovereign prince. The
Vatican is an internationally recognized sovereign entity. The prince, the Pope, presides over an independent
territory or nation-state --- one of the smallest countries in the world. The Popes in ancient times were the Dukes
of Rome and had other sovereign territories as well.) Commenting on ecclesiastic orders other than those under the
Pope, the "International Commission on Orders of Chivalry" (ICOC) considers them to be imitations
and not chivalric in nature. Yet they use chivalric terms. The ICOC then stated,
"We invite these Authorities to use more proper terms for any future creations of awards." The
reason being that ". . . none of [them] . . . possess any type of direct Sovereignty. . . ."
(www.icocregister.org/2007ICOCRegister.pdf)
This is an important issue.
Christian theology recognizes a division between
government sovereignty and religious rights. Over every nation he [God] set a ruler --- a sovereign --- a
secular ruler. (Ecclesiastics 17:14) That is, By me [by the power and authority of God] kings reign, and princes
decree justice. By me [that is, by God] princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth.
(Proverbs 8:15-16) These kings, princes and nobles had sovereignty and it was given them by God. The people,
including the religious leaders, were subordinate to them in government rule. This division is important to remember
in regard to religious claims to the right of sovereignty, because sovereignty, by definition and meaning, is the
domain of the political or secular authorities, not the domain of ecclesiastical authorities, whose domain does not
involve sovereignty. For example in the days of the Kings of Israel, there was a king, who ruled, fought and lead
the military; and a separate man, the high priest and/or prophets, who was the religious leaders, who were
uninvolved with war and had nothing to do with the warriors or what some would call "knights" ---
David's special legendary elite, the "Thirty" or "the mighty ones." (1 Chronicles
11) That is, there was a division between sovereignty and religious leadership. Centuries later this division was
still in force and it continues to this day. No wonder, the disciples of the Christ were taught to "Render .
. . unto Caesar, the things which are Caesar's [that is, honor his right to rule] and [render] to God the things
that are God's [the importance of living a good life]." (Matthew 22:21) Church leaders were told that
both they and the people should submit themselves to the king, as supreme . . . , that is, foremost and
highest in rank.Therefore, Peter admonished his followers to Honour [that is, obey, give deference to] the
[secular] king --- he who held the right to rule. (1 Peter 2:13,17) "For there
is no power but of God: the powers that be [the kings and princes of the earth] are ordained of God."
(Romans 13:1) Therefore, the apostle Paul also wrote, "Put them in mind to be subject to principalities [the
sovereign rulers of these territories] and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work."
(Titus 3:1) (See: "Monarchy
and Nobility: Divine Rights & Responsibilities") The obvious conclusion, which is
only common sense, is that there is a separate and distinct governmental power that religious leaders do not
possess.
No matter what was temporarily done in the early
Middle Ages in terms of knighthood and chivalry, everything has changed. All orders were put under the authority of
the nobility by virtue of the supreme law of nations --- the authority of sovereignty. It needs to be understood
that this situation is now a matter of law. In other words, a major shift took place in international law from the
beginning of the Christian Era to the middle of the seventeenth century ". . . on account of the
international character . . . of the orders of chivalry reacted upon state [or sovereign] practice throughout
Christian Europe." (George Grafton Wilson and George Fox Tucker, International Law, Edition 5,
1910, p. 13) That is:
The great
Orders of Chivalry were international institutions, whose members, having consecrated themselves a military
priesthood, had no longer any country of their own, and could therefore be subject to no one save the Emperor and
the Pope [who was considered to be an international sovereign at the time]. (James Bryce, The Holy Roman
Empire, chapter XV, "The Empire As An International Power," Part 15, 1901)
This is the era where the authority of
sovereignty, the supreme right to rule, completely took over, and all knighthood became subject to the law of
rulers. It is now a fact that for an order of chivalry to have any validity under international law, it must be
offered by a sovereign state or by a reigning or "de jure" monarch.
Dr. Kerr, already quoted in this subchapter, a
former law professor at Antioch School of Law and a published legal expert and scholar in this field, declared very
succinctly that, ". . . certain objects which by their nature are not capable of ownership by private
individuals [such as "orders of chivalry"] . . . may be owned only by international persons. . . ."
(2009: www.mocterranordica.org/Dynastic_Law_.pdf) In
other words:
To be legitimate, an
order of chivalry must have a fons honorum: A sovereign house, a State, or other international
person [who has the supreme right to rule politically or governmentally]. Without such a sovereign fons honorum, the
legitimacy of an order of chivalry lapses [that is, ends or terminates].
Similar to a public
vessel, nuclear weapon, or the bed of a navigable river, no private person can own an order of chivalry. . . .
Orders of chivalry are also objects of public international law and fall within the scope of
international law in the same manner as do . . . public vessels and nuclear weapons." (Ibid. and
"Dynastic
Law")
Therefore, by law, an order not created or
maintained by any authority other than by a living "de jure" or reigning imperial, royal or
princely "sovereign" is either a social order, a brotherhood or merely a chivalric club. It is not
a valid or legitimate order of chivalry. That is, if it is without a "sovereign" fountain of honor,
which is a political or secular right, it is self-styled. Self-styled means, by definition, self-appointed or
self-proclaimed. In other words, it is a false claim --- made up or fabricated. Such are like the self-styled "doctor,"
an impersonator, who has no degree of any kind and never went to medical school. Such a man or woman would be an
imposter or counterfeiter mimicking that which is genuine and true. But the point is, unless a self-styled order of
chivalry is very careful to specify that they are not real orders of chivalry, but are, in truth, only fraternal
orders or clubs with chivalric ideals, they are presenting a falsehood, which is misleading and counter to
international law. Willful misrepresentation of the truth is a lie and violates tort law, if not actual criminal
law, in many countries.
How to Become a Member of a
Legitimate Order
We, of the International Commission on Nobility
and Royalty (ICNR), applaud the fine work of the International Commission on Orders of Chivalry (ICOC).
Their work is essential and critical to the future of what is true and genuine. Many people through the years have
valiantly carried the voice of warning about those who are not what they claim to be, but the ICOC has
organized a way of discerning very quickly by list authentic chivalric organizations.
It is believed that one of the reasons that people
join phony orders of chivalry is because there are so many self-styled orders in existence, and because they do not
know how to become a member of a true order. It seems self-evident that no one really wants to be a part of
something that has no legitimacy---something false or counterfeit. But many good people end up doing this, even
though many of these individuals are worthy in every way of something infinitely better.
Therefore, we have determined that, with the help
of others, we will attempt to show how one can become a member of an authentic order. This will take time. It is a
difficult venture, but worthwhile.
Remember that knighthood in its highest sense is
both an honor as well as a responsibility. Knighthood, at its highest, is a form of a quest for greatness. It is a
remote and heartless, if it only means sending a yearly check. Chivalry should be inseparably connected to such
virtues as being courageous, brave, loyal, courteous and true. Many of the genuine and authentic orders are composed
of people who have already accomplished great things for benefit and good of mankind. Becoming such a knight is one
of the highest honors one can receive in this life. The rolls of knights obviously should not be filled by prominent
businessmen, lawyers and politicians. It should be filled with the good hearted of all socioeconomic
classes.
There are orders that are more open to new members
than others and respect the goodness of the common man. They are equally valid orders and want men and women who
desire to contribute their small share and are willing to do so for the rest of their lives. Though those
contributions may seem relatively small, they add up to something truly great in the life of a man or a woman. In
other words, some become knights by virtue of what they have already done in the past. Others can become knights by
virtue of their determination to create a life worthy of true knighthood for the rest of their lives. (See:
"Chivalry and Modern
Times")
For the truly worthy, we have taken upon ourselves
the project of helping them find out how to become members of those orders which are open to new membership. Please
contact us. (See also: "General
Philosophy & Practices")
Secular State Orders
and
Orders of True
Chivalry
An important distinction should be
made between a true order of chivalry and a secular state order. The insignia of a state order often mimics or
imitates the decorations of true orders conveying true knighthood, but has no ceremony, no oath of loyalty to high
ideals, no bonds of brotherhood, no tradition of a quest, no call to fight evil, promote good, defend the helpless
and the oppressed, in sum, nothing to commit one to a higher level of life and living before the source of all
authority and power in the heavens. Secular orders are stripped of loyalty to king, nobility, heraldry, truth, and
religious influence. In a nutshell, they have lost the ancient spirit and purpose of chivalry. In addition, a
government as an entity in and of itself is not royal. It can't be such. Therefore, it cannot be a fountain for
royal or noble titles or knighthoods. Such is the limited and unique property right of royalty or sovereign princes.
Hence, the International Commission on Nobility and Royalty does not support state orders as conferring valid
and authentic knighthood. It is devoid of what makes a true and rightful fons honorum based on genuine royal
sovereignty rather than republican sovereignty. (Information and ideas originally taken from Stephen P. Kerr, JD,
"A Factual and Juridical Study of the Dynastic Orders and Awards of the Habsburg Monarchy," The
Augustan Society Omnibus Book, Issue 8, 1986, pp. 2-5)
We encourage you to read and enjoy the articles
that follow, which are informative and can deepen one's understanding of the whys and wherefores as well as the true
and permanent rights of royalty, nobility and chivalry. The following articles are considered to be especially
important and valuable:
Use "Contact" to join the Commission
as a contributor or apply for certification for titles, knighthood, status or ancestry. Our goals and mission
are to protect the public from counterfeit titles, phony knighthoods and fake genealogies. We certify the true and
the genuine as well as promote chivalry, royalty and nobility. There is so much that needs to be done. We invite you
to contribute and join with us.
Contact or donate through the
following:
© Copyright 2021/2022 -- International Commission on Nobility
and Royalty. All Rights Reserved.
in Latin is called Ius
Honorum and only true and authentic sovereigns hold it: www.chivalricorders.org/orders/self-styled/selfstyl.htm. (See
also the article: "Title
of Nobility Scams" as well as "Fake Titles and
Counterfiets")
